ABSTRACT
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in high mortality among patients in critical intensive care units. Hence, identifying mortality markers in the follow-up and treatment of these patients is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between mortality rates in patients with COVID-19 and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic inflammation response index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI). Methodology In this study, we assessed 466 critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in the adult intensive care unit of Kastamonu Training and Research Hospital. Age, gender, and comorbidities were recorded at the time of admission along with NLR, dNLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI values from hemogram data. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores and mortality rates over 28 days were recorded. Patients were divided into survival (n = 128) and non-survival (n = 338) groups according to 28-day mortality. Results A statistically significant difference was found between leukocyte, neutrophil, dNLR, APACHE II, and SIRI parameters between the surviving and non-surviving groups. A logistic regression analysis of independent variables of 28-day mortality identified significant associations between dNLR (p = 0.002) and APACHE II score (p < 0.001) and 28-day mortality. Conclusions Inflammatory biomarkers and APACHE II score appear to be good predictive values for mortality in COVID-19 infection. The dNLR value was more effective than other biomarkers in estimating mortality due to COVID-19. In our study, the cut-off value for dNLR was 3.64.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Our aim in this observational prospective study is to determine whether the prone position has an effect on intracranial pressure, by performing ultrasound-guided ONSD (Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter) measurements in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) ventilated in the prone position. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of ARDS who were placed in the prone position for 24 h during their treatment were included in the study. Standardized sedation and neuromuscular blockade were applied to all patients in the prone position. Mechanical ventilation settings were standardized. Demographic data and patients' pCO2, pO2, PaO2/FiO2, SpO2, right and left ONSD data, and complications were recorded at certain times over 24 h. RESULTS: The evaluation of 24-hour prone-position data of patients with ARDS showed no significant increase in ONSD. There was no significant difference in pCO2 values either. PaO2/FiO2 and pO2 values demonstrated significant cumulative increases at all times. Post-prone SPO2 values at the 8th hour and later were significantly higher when compared to baseline (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: As a result of this study, it appears that the prone position does not increase intracranial pressure during the first 24 h and can be safely utilized, given the administration of appropriate sedation, neuromuscular blockade, and mechanical ventilation strategy. ONSD measurements may increase the safety of monitoring in patients ventilated in the prone position.